Lack of prudent
analysis and planning is the underlying disease in our Healthcare System
- not Nurses’ job disruption.
The CEO for Okanagan Health Region in British
Columbia has been venting his disappointment and frustration in the
press and in public meetings over the BC Nurses’ job action in their
pursuit of higher wages and benefits. Nobody would question the
CEO’s sincere concern for the consequences that the Nurses’ action
has on the patient’s and the public’s well-being. It is also
reasonable to believe that the majority of our Nurses share the
CEO’s concerns, and many are also concerned about stretching
society’s sympathies too far.
The real problem is that the strategic issues facing
the Healthcare system - although they have been well known for the
past twenty years - remain unsolved. The aging population, including
doctors and nurses, and gains in science, technology, and how we
prevent and cure disease, did not happen overnight! Unsolved, the
issues have been allowed to become acute, escalating into adversity
and conflicts; wasting tax dollars and ultimately blackmailing
society.
Regardless whether healthcare is provided by the
private sector or government, the costs of healthcare and other
essential services must be paid by economic production and jobs in
our business sector; through wages and taxes at our local grocery
store, restaurant, car dealer, sawmill, manufacturing plant, etc. A
needlessly high cost of healthcare places additional drain on
government funds at the expense of other needs in the community. As
with any government spending, the cost is ultimately carried by the
public and business sector. This hampers economic production and job
creation and in the end - good health. Good health is directly
related to the socioeconomic conditions in which we live. It is
affected by investment in education, in sustainable and
internationally competitive businesses that distribute wealth via
better paid jobs, and by a strong tax base, a good environment,
clean air and water, and importantly a responsible government.
Unnecessary spending in healthcare is at the expense
of this and other aims in the community that are the foundation of
good health. Good socioeconomic and environmental standards are what
good public health entirely depends upon. Our business sector cannot
compensate for the high cost of healthcare by paying more taxes and
raising prices. That will inevitably erode real income and jobs, and
hence the socioeconomic standards that guarantee good health in our
community.
To attract investment from investors at home and
abroad, British Columbia needs to utilize business potential and
create jobs such as in the value added forest sector. That will
depend on radical changes to our over 9.2 Billion dollar healthcare
system, exceeding 37% of BC’s tax spending -as well as radical
changes to our government institutions from the local town hall and
up.
This is the vicious circle that needs to be
discussed by the CEOs, the politicians, and the bureaucrats. We have
a politically driven healthcare system where too little is spent on
preventing disease and where the trivially sick are treated at the
expense of the really sick.
The outdated fee for service model, where physicians
are doing jobs nurses could do, and nurses are doing jobs someone
else could do, where politically driven regional decentralization
duplicates administration, and poorly developed information
technology systems hinder solutions. The system contradicts its own
purposes and is in desperate need of renewal, not Band-Aids, but
major surgery, to avoid that increased wages, and operational cost
is masking unsolved underlying problems.
Lack of planning and timely action is leading to
adversity that is fueling the pressure for privatization of our
healthcare system, raising costs, and eroding our competitiveness.
The boosters of privatization often seem to overlook that the US
mixed public and private insurance system, has the highest
healthcare cost per capita, which is a serious drawback for US
business. At the same time, approximately 44 million people in the
US lack health insurance and access to adequate healthcare.
The driving force for privatization in Canada is of
course the astonishing amount of money to be made. The Toronto Stock
Exchange’s TSE index would go through the roof and fortunes would be
added from the privatization of the Canadian healthcare system.
There would be little consideration for most Canadians, the small
and midsize businesses, jobs, and quality of life in the local
community.
The now acute health care problems could have been
prevented, taxes saved and invested in the real factors that build
good somatic and psychiatric health in the community. The present
system is not sustainable, and that is not the nurse’s fault.
They realize that they and their families are also
members of the community and share the penalty of a dysfunctional
healthcare system. The problems are known and solutions available
but nothing of significance changes. Short-term issues and crises
continue to absorb resources and make the headlines, but little is
done to address the core problems. After decades of ignoring the
real issues and avoiding solutions, the Federal Government has
formed a committee to study the issues. Unfortunately for the
public, the best way to avoid accountability is to ensure that
nobody is accountable by forming a committee.
Solving the nurse’s and other job action by paying
whatever is asked is easy. Finding sustainable solutions to the real
issues is more difficult. But in the long run, the latter is what
will influence our overall health, quality of life, and
international competitiveness. Will our new government in British
Columbia make this a priority? Are they willing to do what is needed
or simply what is expedient?
Okanagan Institute for Strategic Development
May 2001